This looks to be about as good for women as Match.com if they live in a metropolitan area that has lots of members. Any decent online dating service is at least 3 stars for a semi-attractive female. Cherry pickers are the ones doing the most complaining from the female side of the sites. In my more rural area, even Match.com has trouble with the membership levels. It takes about 1000 members of the opposite sex in your age group in American society to supply about a dozen people you would want to date seriously and 3 that are marriage material. That's just a fact I dug up. Women can get dates on these online websites, but guys are at a 3:1 disadvantage or more and only the most attractive males, that tend to be players anyway, will hang around for very long. Every agency/website that wants to succeed will have to limit male members until the females in this society grow some skin and are able to handle the hard knocks of online dating and dating agencies. I once joined Together Dating Service, and it was just as bad as online dating, except they charged over a thousand dollars to most members. Women often got free memberships to try to get their numbers up. It sucked, and I sued them and got my money back. Since women don't seem to give a damn in this society, except to have their big fat ugly butts kissed for putting out almost no effort on their part, I suggest that guys do what women do: Put up a free profile and browse around a bit to see what happens with almost no effort on your part, then get lost. You have tried as hard as 90% of the famales, if not harder. The percentage of inactive or barely active female members far outnumber the male members. Sites like Friend Finder and Matchmaker keep female profiles from years back. The women who are most active tend to have serious emotional and personal issues past the first month or two of membership. That means you have to limit to recent members, and so the number of decent females takes a further big drop. Most older women are divorced, and you quickly learn it was usually for a damned good reason somebody wanted rid of them. Be wary of those people who have been online for over 90 days. It's better to take a season off from online dating after a 90 day period, in order to get your head screwed back on straight. There are stupid women on these websites that think men are rolling in offers from every female around. People meeting more people online than in real life tend to be wacko anyway. Women who do not have photos available or send one before meeting are to be dumped immediately as they are butt ugly before the emotional and personal issues are even considered. I tried that once, and you should have seen the headcase wacko pig I wasted a night and 100 miles of round trip driving on. Online dating is a bad, Bad, BAD experience for any decent guy in America. In real life, you are 60% likely to meet a fat woman, and only 10% are actually in good physical condition and slim. All the attractive and emotionally stable women are hit on by men all the time, so you know what ends up in the online dating world. Those who ARE attractive and emotionally stable in online dating are cherry pickers who what somebody above their league. If you were in their shoes, you might be doing it yourself. You already have access to men who are in your league offline, so you take absolutely ZERO RISK and have to commit absolutely nothing to get a date online as you are getting them already in the offline world. I would suggest going to eastern Europe where the odds are in the men's favor like it's in the women's favor here. Go ahead and date any woman that might come along here, but keep your sites on an eastern European woman that has a model figure and an outstanding personality. Set your mind on making the money that allows this, so don't go blowing your assets on American women unless they want to date Dutch. You will then be thinking like American women and might start having some success. The last thing you do is kiss bitch butt if you want to find a decent woman.